Rabbi Shmuel Miller, Sofer

TorahSofer.com 

 

 

               

 

 

Home
      

                                          

   

 

 

PREVENTING “CYBER TERROR”

We deeply apologize to any of you who after clicking on our torahsofer.com link in a search engine were re-directed to a porn site during Oct, Nov and beginning of Dec. ’02. We spent these months struggling to get our torahsofer.com domain returned to us. Our registration lapsed when our registrar sent our renewal invoice to a defunct email address. Because we never received the bill, the domain name expired and became available for re-registration. It was snapped up by a company that redirected our visitors to a porn site. 

In hopes that we might protect others from this ordeal, we have excerpted some articles with tips on how to protect your website from attack.

For us, the most important intervention was to make sure the email contact address given to the domain name registrar is a permanent established email account belonging to a trusted, knowledgeable person who will be responsible for paying the registration renewal fee on time. We also gave an alternative email address as a back-up. In addition, we learned that it is important to check on our own website frequently.

We consulted with excellent attorneys who specialize in the Internet and intellectual property rights. We would be happy to refer them to you.

*************************************************

Excerpt from ICANN http://www.icannwatch.org/article.pl?sid=02/10/30/094857

As was discussed…here back in September(?), porn sites are staking out domain names that are about to expire and taking over while the search engine descriptions remain the same and unsuspecting referral sites continue to link. The question is, what can be done about this? I suggest ICANN push for a "holding period" where a domain name remains listed as "occupied" for a certain time after its registration has expired. While I hate AOL, I must give credit where it is due, for they have this sort of "holding period" on screen names. If you decide to cancel your AOL account, your screen name remains reserved for a set period of time (90 days?) where you can re-claim it if you so choose. If you don't renew your account or reclaim the screen name, it goes back into the pool of eligible screen names for other users…. If you're in charge of the site, you have to know what's going on with it, which necessarily entails knowing when the domain name expires.

##############################################

Excerpted from

Domains Reregistered for Distribution of Unrelated Content: A Case Study of "Tina's Free Live Webcam"

http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/edelman/renewals/#motivation 



In recent years, many Internet users have become aware that when domain names expire (after their original registrants forget, fail, or otherwise decline to renew them), the domain names may be reregistered by others. This feature of the management of the domain name system might be thought to be desirable since it allows and facilitates a turnover of names from those uninterested in using them to those who in fact do seek to put them to active use. But recent experience shows that this structure also allows domains to be renewed by firms who do not seem to seek to use the domains to offer original content but rather seem to hope to profit from the prior promotional works of others.



In particular, such firms often offer pornographic or sexually-explicit images, advertising, or links or redirects to other commercial sites. The apparent expectation of such firms is that at least some users will request the web pages previously (before domain expiration) hosting other content; any such users will instead be shown this new content, likely creating profits for the firms that reregistered the expired domain names.


The domain names that redirect …many …have character strings that suggest the presence of content quite different from the content ultimately presented after a redirect to the Tina site. For example, americanmuseumofnaturalhistory.com, aplusparents.com, babysitters.com, bicyclebills.com, childrens-media.org, childrenwithaids.org, familyconnection.net, freecipro.com, fraudindex.com, harvardfootball.org, jackson-family.com, minnesotamom.com, napa-auto-parts.com, oceanicmuseum.com, ourchildstoys.com, ridgefieldhighschool.com, and savannah-bbb.org each suggest the availability of a certain kind of content other than sexually-explicit images.



To the extent that reregistrations by new registrants are thought to be problematic, the concern likely results from at least three factors. First, as a result of such reregistration, the initial registrant loses the use of the domain name at issue; the loss of the domain presents a setback to the initial registrant's prior efforts to build a business, identity, or brand around the domain name. Second, should the subsequent registrant use the domain to provide content that the initial registrant's customers or associates consider offensive, illegal, or otherwise undesirable, the initial registrant risks some tarnishment of his reputation from the undesirable content offered at his prior domain. Third, there may be privacy implications, as when sensitive materials are sent to email addresses at domains operated by a new registrant.



It is important to note that the second cause for concern results not only from users typing in outdated web addresses from memory (or from fixed sources such as business cards, letterhead, or advertisements). Instead, current testing reflects that search engines and other pages may continue to offer outdated links and descriptions -- references that fail to properly represent the latest content available at a given web address.



While these problems are difficult to resolve within the framework of domains registered for use for some number of years -- rather than "owned" as real property may be owned -- several policies may help to mitigate the problem.


Increased consumer education would help users of the Internet understand the possibility that unexpected content may result when domains transition between registrants.



Education of domain registrants would help consumers of domain registration services better understand the importance of promptly paying renewal fees. Such education might take place at the time of domain registration and renewal, as well as via FAQs posted on registrar web sites. To the extent that registrants fail to renew domains names due to difficulty differentiating between legitimate invoices from a registrant's actual registrar versus solicitations from those soliciting new business, the registration process would benefit from reduction in the rate of such solicitations as well as from improvements to the labeling of such solicitations.



The structure of the domain name system could be put to use in reminding registrants of the need to renew …

In addition to the public registrant contact information made available via WHOIS, registrars could offer registrants the opportunity to provide a "secret" "emergency-use-only" email address to be used only for final notification just before final deactivation of a domain after failure to renew on time. By setting this address to some (tentatively) "permanent" address -- perhaps an address of a more knowledgeable or experienced colleague or friend -- a registrant could add an additional check before domain expiration. Since this address would not be included in public WHOIS records, registrants would have no incentive to provide an invalid address.



Background information about this topic is available from articles such as the following: Invasion of the "Porn Nappers" . Business Week. March 7, 2002.
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/mar2002/nf2002037_2837.htm?c=bwtechmar08&n=link3&t=email 



Porn Sites Hijack Expired Domain Names. PC World. March 8, 2002.
http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,87824,00.asp 



WARNING to Christian Website Owners: Do not let your domain name expire or it is likely to be taken over by a porn dealer!
http://gnwda.org/alert.htm 



Excerpted from:

SPECIAL REPORT: Have you protected your domain from cybersquatters?

http://www.betterwhois.com/cybersquatters.htm 

Can this really happen? Is this legal?



Yes, it can and does happen everyday. Is it legal? Depending on the situation, site owners may have legal recourse (e.g. trademark  infringement lawsuits or arbitration). However, even when a cybersquatter is breaking the law, it can be time-consuming and expensive for a site owner to win a legal judgment, especially if the cybersquatter is located in a different country. In some circumstances, it is possible to reclaim names through domain arbitration, however this can cost thousands and can take many months. Full blown domain related law suits can take years and cost tens of thousands of dollars.



The easiest (and cheapest) way to prevent most cybersquatting is to register a few basic variations of your company name before the damage is done.



Which names should I register?



1. COM/NET/BIZ: Hopefully, you have already registered the .COM version of your company name. To be safe, register the .NET and .BIZ variations. Some companies also register the .ORG and .INFO variations for additional safety.



2. Hyphenation: If your company name has more than one word in it, register it both with and without a dash. (e.g. usair.com and us-air.com)



3. Singular/Plural: If your name lends itself to it, register its singular and plural versions. (e.g. fordtruck.com and fordtrucks.com)



4. Common Misspellings: If your name can be easily misspelled, register common misspellings (e.g. volkswagon.com and volkswagen.com)



5. And finally, the juvenile sounding but damaging 'sucks' variation: Many experienced internet users routinely type in the 'sucks' variation of a company name on their browser to find complaints about a company. Most savvy companies now make it standard procedure to register this name before a vindictive person does. (e.g. verizonsucks.com)

samawel@pacbell.net

 

 

   

 

   

 

Copyright 2005